Posts Tagged ‘energy efficiency’

Benefits of Green Building


Green buildings have realized substantial bottom line savings from more energy efficient heating and cooling systems, ventilation, waste reduction and environmental sustainability. While initial investment is required to incorporate environmentally friendly technologies and design into buildings, the savings far outweigh the costs. In fact, the California Sustainable Building Task Force shows that an initial increase in upfront costs of approximately 2% for green design will yield lifecycle savings of more than ten times the initial investment, or 20% of total construction costs (based on a conservative estimate of a 20-year building life.)

Even the startup costs of building green can be comparable or less expensive than average construction prices where resource efficient and smaller mechanical, electrical and structural systems are more effective than oversized, underutilized systems, according to the US Green Building Council (USGBC). Generally, McGraw-Hill Construction estimates that green buildings generate an increase of 7.5% in a building’s value and a 6.6% improvement in return on investment, while decreasing operating costs by 8-9%.

The payoffs go far beyond financial returns. A recent study published by the University of San Diego and CB Richard Ellis Group showed that employees in LEED certified buildings take 2.9 less sick days each year than in non-green offices, which saves their employers roughly $1,200 per worker and results in significant productivity gains that generate sales. The research doesn’t determine exactly which green technologies improve employee health and productivity, but it is clear that natural lighting and cleaner air increase office stamina and even retain staff.

Externally, green buildings are creating market differentiation opportunities, improving reputations with clients and minimizing risks to corporate brand equity. Even in recessionary times, green buildings have been commanding higher rents; $30 per square foot, $3 over the national average of $27, and vacancy rates are over a percentage point lower. Green buildings also welcome government tenants and increase public sector good will.

Demand for green buildings continues to climb, as the value of green building construction is expected to reach $60 billion in 2010, up from $12 billion in 2008. Green is being incorporated into building codes at local and state levels. By upgrading now, buildings can anticipate these mandates and upgrade on their own terms, avoiding delays or operational losses. As more and more buildings become LEED certified, traditional buildings risk obsolescence and forfeit any first mover benefits of going green. Simply put, green buildings create a triple net effect, benefitting the owners’ bottom line, its tenants, and the environment. This author is left with just one question: Why notbuild green?

Courtesy of www.justmeans.com

On Buildings and Climate Change…


The importance of energy-efficient buildings in mitigating effects of climate change was highlighted Friday at the climate conference currently taking place in Copenhagen. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) released a report Dec. 11 urging that buildings be considered as a major component of any strategy concerning emissions reduction.

UNEP’s report, “Buildings and Climate Change – Summary for Decision Makers,” emphasizes that buildings are an area of great potential to impact climate change. The report is a result of three years of study by the UNEP Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative (SBCI), a think tank and partnership between the United Nations and leading companies and organizations in the building sector.

Buildings account for more than 30 percent of worldwide energy use. Fortunately, buildings present vast opportunities to reduce energy consumption and related greenhouse gas emissions. Globally, buildings generate the equivalent of 8.6 billion tons of CO2 a year, according to the report, and this amount is expected to nearly double over the next two decades. Population growth and urbanization are cited as the impetus for new construction growth.

For example, new construction in China over the next ten years will be so prolific that it will equal the size of all existing buildings in the United States, the report says. Investment in new buildings is also expected in South Africa. UNEP warns booms like these will likely double the amount of pollution associated with energy use in buildings.

Along with the report, the climate summit served as the debut of SBCI’s global Common Carbon Metric for Buildings to measure energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of buildings. The new metrics were created in conjunction with the International Energy Agency, International Standardization organization, World Green Building Council, International Initiative for the Sustainable Built Environment and Sustainable Buildings Alliance as well as private sector companies and associations.

This information adapted from greenandsave.com News

Study:Net Zero Homes Save $$


An Environment Texas Research and Policy Center study released last week found that if 10 percent more “net-zero” houses were built each year for the next decade, and all new homes were built that way by 2020, Texans could save more than $5 billion in utility bills.

In Austin, a 40-house net-zero development is under construction about two miles from downtown. The homes are designed to be about 45 percent more energy efficient, with solar energy bringing the net use to zero. Construction of these homes costs about 15 percent more than building a traditional house, but the savings eventually make up for it.

The study estimates homes would save an average of $500 a year in energy bills, and the reduced annual emissions would be equivalent to cutting the pollution of more than three million cars in the nation’s leading greenhouse-gas producing state by 2030.

The report calls on state and federal officials to do more to make the upgrades affordable. State agencies this fall will consider increasing efficiency standards and requiring utilities to provide incentives. A bill passed in the 2009 legislative session authorizes cities to offer incentives.

Associated Press article

Green That’s Not So Mean


Along with the wonderful opportunities to purchase homes at good prices and great interest rates right now, come some deliciously compelling opportunities to green your current home or buy green. 

 You probably know that this summer, the City of Austin made Energy Audits mandatory in conjunction with home sales.  You may not know that the feedback coming from those inspections is coming in, and homes are consistently rating most poorly in areas of insulation and damaged ductwork.  With much of our local construction style involving dark roofs with AC ducting in uninsulated attics where the summer temps can rise to 125 degrees, it’s no wonder these poor, baked ducts are commonly showing leakage rates of 30-40%.  You can save a lot of money when you aren’t air conditioning the great outdoors! 

There are some fabulous, and relatively untapped, sources of federal tax rebates to reimburse you for having energy retrofit work done, so you can get paid in rebates and save with lower bills.  Earlier this year, Congress approved the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.  Until Dec. 31, 2010, homeowners can take advantage of a national tax credit of 30% of the cost, up to $1,500, on a variety of energy-saving products. Insulation, windows and doors, roofing, heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, tankless water heaters and alternative energy programs, such as solar panels and wind turbines.   Check the Green Living Library for a pdf that outlines these rebates and how to use them.  Stanberry’s Green Team has also assembled some notable discounts through local contractors to enhance your savings even further, also available on our Green Living site. 

If you are considering purchasing a more energy efficient home, we can help you save money on that as well.  New Energy Efficient Mortgages allow you to identify a home to buy, have a HERS rating inspection done (Home Energy Rating System), then borrow an additional amount to cover energy upgrades that will be done at closing.  The title company escrows money to pay contractors, and you can count the monthly savings you will experience as part of your income qualification!  So you can afford more, expect lower energy bills, and on top of that, get money back from the Federal Government for the improvements! 

 The process is made simple by using professionals that understand the processes, and that starts with an informed REALTOR, who is at the center fitting the pieces together for you.  Please let us know how we can assist you; we know the inventory, the processes, and can help make the way smooth through the entire process.  You just can’t say ‘mean green’ anymore, because green is makin’ the livin’ easy!

Fed Clean-Energy Officials Meet w/ State Leaders in Austin


A high-powered group of state and local leaders met in Austin on Friday with officials from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory as the lab explores the prospect of collaborating with Central Texas groups on clean-energy initiatives.

The delegation from the U.S. Department of Energy lab was led by Robert McGrath, the lab’s deputy director for science and technology. Also attending were Robert Hawsey, an associate lab director for renewable electricity and end-use systems; Pete Sheldon, a scientist in the lab’s National Center for Photovoltaics, and David Ginley, a research fellow working with HelioVolt Corp., a pioneering solar power technology company in Austin.

“Texas is moving forward smartly and aggressively with deployment of renewable and energy efficiency technologies,” McGrath said. “We see multiple opportunities for partnerships for technology development and for renewable energy and energy efficiency deployment with many of the industry and university groups with which we met today.”

McGrath said his organization, which is based in Golden, Colo., wants to “capitalize upon the very productive, long-standing and continuing collaboration that NREL has with HelioVolt.”

Friday’s introductory meeting with state officials, led by Comptroller Susan Combs, included representatives from Gov. Rick Perry’s policy office and the Texas Enterprise Fund, state and federal lawmakers or their aides and Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce representatives.

Another meeting took place with managers of area utilities, including Austin Energy and CPS Energy of San Antonio, and officials with the University of Texas and Texas A&M systems and Texas State University.

McGrath said the officials all “enthusiastically encouraged” the lab’s expanded participation in planning and implementing renewable energy projects in Texas.

Laboratory officials also toured HelioVolt’s Southeast Austin plant with company executives and U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin.

“Obviously we want to transform Texas into a clean-technology leader, and we want to make the greater Austin region a center of innovation for clean technologies,” said Jose Beceiro, director of clean-energy initiatives for the Austin chamber.

Beceiro said local officials have been talking to the lab for a while. He was not at Friday’s meetings but has been involved in previous discussions about collaborating with the lab.

A larger presence of the lab in the Austin area could help recruit clean-technology companies and green jobs, developing new clean-energy technologies and attracting more federal grant money, Beceiro said.

B.J. Stanbery, chairman of both HelioVolt and the nonprofit Texas Foundation for Innovative Communities, said that “Central Texas’ unique combination of diverse utility markets, world-class research institutions and farsighted public leadership provide an opportunity for NREL to further their mission of accelerating commercialization and deployment of renewable energy.”

Bob King, president of Good Company Associates Inc., a business development consulting practice focused on energy efficiency and renewable energy, said his company helped the Texas Foundation for Innovative Communities organize Friday’s meetings.

King emphasized that discussions are in the early stages about how “the Central Texas communities can benefit from a relationship with our national lab,” which he called “the only national lab whose entire responsibility is energy efficiency and renewable energy.”

King said the meetings were productive.

“Everyone left with the next actions to take, and we’ll be having follow-up meetings,” he said. “This could be a long process, but I think we made some progress today.”

Article courtesy AAS, snovak@statesman.com; 445-3856

Green Home Demand Going Up


More home buyers want eco-friendly or “green” homes since the recession- NewsHerald.comGreenResourcesHeader-2-small

“I think it’s just basic economics,” said Tom Gladstone, Florida Association of Home Builders regional vice president. “People are just more concerned about how they are spending their money.”

Gladstone owns Tom Gladstone Homes in Panama City and is a certified green professional. People looking to buy a new home want one with lower utility bills, he said. Homes using energy-efficient materials save about 25 percent to 30 percent a month on utilities for homeowners, he said.

A McGraw-Hill Construction report released in March shows green construction is up nationwide, said Arlene Stewart, AZS Consulting president. Construction is down about 40 percent compared to this time last year, according to another McGraw report, but what is being built must be eco-friendly to sell, Stewart said. The company is certified to inspect houses for green construction, according to its Web site.

“All reports indicate if you want to sell, it’s going to have to be green in more than one way,” Stewart said. “It’s a choice between either selling your projects or not selling your projects.”

Gladstone said between more energy-efficient technology and federal tax credits to encourage efficiency, more builders are building greener homes in the past couple of years. The National Association of Home Builders has seen about 25 homes per week since it began its certification program last year. Four homes are U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED-certified. LEED, which stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, is a standard for determining how eco-friendly a home is.

Greener Buildings Boost Profit?


Green, more than a color, is a catchall term used to describe an ecoconscious lifestyle, including everything from hybrid-fuel-powered cars to recycled consumer goods to solar electricity. The big-minded concept is to preserve the Earth’s natural resources by reducing waste and pollution through innovative design and improved efficiency. In development circles, green has gone from a boutique idea to a mandatory part of architecture and construction.

“It’s not just about energy savings,” said Craig Willcut, president of United Construction, which opened new sustainable offices in Reno this year. “It’s about providing a healthy environment for employees, as well as being socially responsible for our part of the environment.”

Buildings are responsible for 40 percent of the Earth’s global warming, observers say.

 ”Corporate responsibility is becoming unavoidable,” said Rick Van Diepen, chairman of the Committee on the Environment for the Las Vegas chapter of the American Institute of Architects. “Employee productivity is being improved by 1 percent to 2 percent, conservatively, by working in a green building. That is a huge bottom-line savings.”

“Turning green can cut energy costs by 40 percent or more, and upgrading a building’s lighting can add $6 per square foot to its value.”

Read the entire article here:  Las Vegas Review-Journal: http://www.lvrj.com/business/52301302.html

$22 Million For Community Renewable Energy Deployment


The Department of Energy (DOE) says it plans to provide up to $22 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to support the planning and installation of utility-scale community renewable energy projects in up to four communities nationwide.

The DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy will provide technical assistance to selected recipients, including concepts, best practices, planning, financial approaches, policy guidance and recognition to help communities rapidly plan and deploy utility-scale renewable energy systems.

The projects will demonstrate how multiple renewable energy technologies, including solar, wind, biomass and geothermal systems, can be deployed at scale to supply clean energy to communities.

The DOE anticipates that each project will leverage significant investment, including public- and private-sector investment in renewable energy systems.

Up to $22 million in DOE funding is available for these awards in fiscal year 2010. The DOE anticipates making up to four awards totaling up to $21.45 million, and expects matching funds from public and private investment of $22 million or more.

Successful applicants will be awarded financial assistance to support the implementation of an integrated renewable energy deployment plan for a community, and the construction of renewable energy systems.

Completed applications are due Sept. 3. The DOE will select the award-winners by the end of November.

For more information, visit recovery.gov.

SOURCE: Department of Energy via North American Windpower

Technology for a Low Carbon Future


This report from The Climate Group finds that scaling up energy efficiency and renewable energy while avoiding deforestation can dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the short term, and are much-needed steps to achieve global climate goals. Low Carbon Report

From the executive summary:

In recent years the scientific evidence on climate change has become increasingly clear: it is now almost universally accepted that, in order to minimise the risk of irreversible damage to our planet and our livelihoods, we need to strive to keep the average global temperature increase below 2°C. it is also widely recognised that, to achieve this, we will need to peak global emissions before 2020 and then reduce them by 50-85% below 2000 levels, setting interim targets along the way.

Likewise, the political will to act is in place. Heads of government from all parts of the world have declared their willingness to adopt ambitious emissions targets, both individually and collectively, but have wanted to be sure that such goals, while certainly challenging, are practically achievable. This report shows that this is indeed the case.

From analysis of the current status of the major abatement solutions, we draw five major conclusions:

1.We know the technologies we need, where to deploy them and the investment required.
2. The technologies required to meet our 2020 goals are already proven, available now and the policies needed to implement them known.
3. Investment now in the technologies of the future order is essential if we are to meet longer-term targets.
4. Financial support will be needed to enable global deployment of low-carbon technologies but the non-climate benefits are also significant.
5. Copenhagen can provide the spur for international collaboration that will bring costs down and accelerate diffusion and deployment.

Successfully reducing emissions to prevent dangerous climate change is without doubt a huge challenge and will require a revolution in the way we produce and consume energy, travel and design and manage our urban and rural environments. However, the pathway to this revolution is clear and, by means of ambitious international collaboration to develop and deploy low-carbon technologies, well within our grasp. We know what we have to do; this report shows us how.

Click Here to Download Full Report:

http://www.greenerbuildings.com/files/document/Technology_for_a_low_carbon_future_report.pdf

Article courtesy of Greener Buildings