Posts Tagged ‘sustainable’

New Climate Change Policy? Displacement.


The Copenhagen climate change meeting might actually turn out to be a success over time. China introduced their plan to limit green house gas emissions which was embraced by most of the world with the exception of Europe and the United States, although Barack Obama made some favorable comments about the Chinese plan.

So what is the Chinese plan? Basically it is one of energy displacement without any caps on emissions. They plan on radically increasing the amount of energy that they will produce from renewable resources (wind, solar, and even nuclear) but will not agree to any caps on carbon emissions. The idea is that renewable energy will always be used before a utility will turn to burning fossil fuel to generate electricity. The more renewable energy you build, the less fossil fuel you burn based on a given demand. If you can grow your renewable infrastructure to the point where you are increasing your renewable energy capacity faster than your electric demand then you will start reducing carbon emissions.

China currently receives only a tiny fraction of its electric power from renewable sources (other than hydroelectric). They will try to double their renewable energy production each year for the foreseeable future. It will take many years of doubling to reach an equilibrium point with an economy growing 10% per year. They talk about reducing the carbon output for each unit of production.

Why are the Chinese using this approach? Cap and trade just doesn’t work for them. They can’t put carbon limits on an economy that is growing 10% per year. If the caps really worked, their growth rate would decline substantially. They are not willing to give up the growth which provides jobs for the hundreds of millions of Chinese looking for work to move out of poverty.

To implement this policy of displacement, the Chinese government had decreed that power companies must buy all of the renewable energy produced even if the price of that energy is higher than the price of energy produced from fossil fuels. Note that the price renewable energy producers can charge is regulated by the government but is typically set at a price that provides a decent return for the company. China will also provide fast approval for renewable projects and will work to build out their electric grid to connect new power sources.

The First Solar deal with China to build 20 GigaWatts of solar collectors by the year 2020 is a good example of this policy at work. China guaranteed First Solar a rate tariff on the electricity produced that would make them a profit if they would build a factory in China to produce the panels. China will build the transmission lines to get the power to market for them. In 2020 China will have 20 GigaWatts for solar power which will mean they will product 20 GigaWatts less power from fossil fuels when the sun shines.

The displacement policy means Chinese wind and solar system producers are gearing up to increase production dramatically. This high consistent demand is allowing them to use scale to drive down manufacturing costs. One day renewable may become cost effective as a power source compared to fossil fuels and China won’t have to subsidize their production. In the mean time China creates whole new industries with tremendous export potential and thousands (millions?) of new jobs. They also don’t have to be heavy handed with energy consumers. Consumers will pay a slightly higher price for electricity as the utility companies pass through the higher prices they pay for renewable power.

Read more at Examiner.com:  http://tinyurl.com/y85gcks

Benefits of Green Building


Green buildings have realized substantial bottom line savings from more energy efficient heating and cooling systems, ventilation, waste reduction and environmental sustainability. While initial investment is required to incorporate environmentally friendly technologies and design into buildings, the savings far outweigh the costs. In fact, the California Sustainable Building Task Force shows that an initial increase in upfront costs of approximately 2% for green design will yield lifecycle savings of more than ten times the initial investment, or 20% of total construction costs (based on a conservative estimate of a 20-year building life.)

Even the startup costs of building green can be comparable or less expensive than average construction prices where resource efficient and smaller mechanical, electrical and structural systems are more effective than oversized, underutilized systems, according to the US Green Building Council (USGBC). Generally, McGraw-Hill Construction estimates that green buildings generate an increase of 7.5% in a building’s value and a 6.6% improvement in return on investment, while decreasing operating costs by 8-9%.

The payoffs go far beyond financial returns. A recent study published by the University of San Diego and CB Richard Ellis Group showed that employees in LEED certified buildings take 2.9 less sick days each year than in non-green offices, which saves their employers roughly $1,200 per worker and results in significant productivity gains that generate sales. The research doesn’t determine exactly which green technologies improve employee health and productivity, but it is clear that natural lighting and cleaner air increase office stamina and even retain staff.

Externally, green buildings are creating market differentiation opportunities, improving reputations with clients and minimizing risks to corporate brand equity. Even in recessionary times, green buildings have been commanding higher rents; $30 per square foot, $3 over the national average of $27, and vacancy rates are over a percentage point lower. Green buildings also welcome government tenants and increase public sector good will.

Demand for green buildings continues to climb, as the value of green building construction is expected to reach $60 billion in 2010, up from $12 billion in 2008. Green is being incorporated into building codes at local and state levels. By upgrading now, buildings can anticipate these mandates and upgrade on their own terms, avoiding delays or operational losses. As more and more buildings become LEED certified, traditional buildings risk obsolescence and forfeit any first mover benefits of going green. Simply put, green buildings create a triple net effect, benefitting the owners’ bottom line, its tenants, and the environment. This author is left with just one question: Why notbuild green?

Courtesy of www.justmeans.com

On Buildings and Climate Change…


The importance of energy-efficient buildings in mitigating effects of climate change was highlighted Friday at the climate conference currently taking place in Copenhagen. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) released a report Dec. 11 urging that buildings be considered as a major component of any strategy concerning emissions reduction.

UNEP’s report, “Buildings and Climate Change – Summary for Decision Makers,” emphasizes that buildings are an area of great potential to impact climate change. The report is a result of three years of study by the UNEP Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative (SBCI), a think tank and partnership between the United Nations and leading companies and organizations in the building sector.

Buildings account for more than 30 percent of worldwide energy use. Fortunately, buildings present vast opportunities to reduce energy consumption and related greenhouse gas emissions. Globally, buildings generate the equivalent of 8.6 billion tons of CO2 a year, according to the report, and this amount is expected to nearly double over the next two decades. Population growth and urbanization are cited as the impetus for new construction growth.

For example, new construction in China over the next ten years will be so prolific that it will equal the size of all existing buildings in the United States, the report says. Investment in new buildings is also expected in South Africa. UNEP warns booms like these will likely double the amount of pollution associated with energy use in buildings.

Along with the report, the climate summit served as the debut of SBCI’s global Common Carbon Metric for Buildings to measure energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of buildings. The new metrics were created in conjunction with the International Energy Agency, International Standardization organization, World Green Building Council, International Initiative for the Sustainable Built Environment and Sustainable Buildings Alliance as well as private sector companies and associations.

This information adapted from greenandsave.com News

Green Home Trends


Green Home Trends: Ten Ways to Make your Home Greener…  A nice overview and links for ten new products; smokeless, portable indoor/outdoor fireplace, biodegradable furniture, home composting systems, new light emitting strips, water conserving plant and lawn systems and more.

http://www.realtor.org/rmohome_and_design/articles/2009/0902_househome_greener

Sustainable Living Seven (Part Two)


Buy Less, Buy Conscientiously- Consider Life Cycle of Purchases

 We have become a nation of consumers. We all have so much STUFF we don’t really need, and we are not very aware of the ultimate cost of these habits.  The more STUFF we buy, the more materials are mined, harvested, or otherwise extracted, and the more waste we have to dispose of.   That’s a problem with serious environmental costs on both ends of a process called the Materials Economy, which involves extraction (use of finite natural resources), production (producing pollutants, using energy), distribution (more pollutants, more energy use), consumption (that’s us, and ok, the fun part), and disposal.  You KNOW that last one is a problem…

 Our enthusiastic (and not very well thought out purchasing) strains finite natural resources of water, minerals, oil, forests, animals; contributes billions of tons of unnecessary pollution, and goes quickly (only 1% of what we buy is still in use in six months!) into landfills that pollute water and soil.  We all know the toll that buying all this STUFF on credit has on our financial health, too.

 There is a wonderful, entertaining little video called “The Story of Stuff” that delightfully illustrates this whole idea, and you might even find it appropriate for children to help them understand how it helps the planet to resist the siren call of “more stuff!”

It’s high time we become more conscious in our buying decisions.  We need to reclaim thrift as a value, and be wise about the whole cycle of purchasing.  The next time an ad tempts you to be happier, healthier, sexier, or smarter by buying “whatever”; think twice.  Consider whether this purchase will REALLY deliver on that promise.  Maybe you could: Buy used/refurbished, borrow it from a friend, rent it, repair the one you have, trade or share. 

We have to work to change the paradigm we currently operate in, which has been humorously identified as “The one with the most toys when they die wins”.  Maybe instead of buying YET another pair of shoes to feel better, we call a friend. Or volunteer to clean up a local park.  We can learn to be involved with other people in ways that don’t involve getting in the car and going to the mall and buying things we don’t really need because we saw them on TV.  It can be so satisfying to grow things yourself, make it from scratch, repair, and otherwise be a wise and conservative steward of  dwindling resources.

 If buying is really the only good solution, compare carefully.  Consider the entire life cycle.  Buy products produced as intelligently as possible; minimal packaging, produced as locally as possible.  Consider the extraction part of the cycle.  Fair trade? Animal friendly?  Renewable resources? Read labels for toxic chemicals in the products.  A good one for cosmetics is the Cosmetics Safety Database. Is the same product available without coloring or additives?  Is it sturdy; will it last?  Many products now are intended to be disposable for convenience, but consider the wastefulness of that with each purchase.  Maybe a real razor with refills over plastic disposables.  Buy larger sizes to cut down on wasteful packaging.  Buy in bulk.  Also shop locally, and carry your own bag.  Stanberry has sturdy, reusable tote bags available for the asking!  

Tune in to Stanberry Sustainable Living Seven (3) for the next step in the process, disposing of waste in the best ways possible.

Sustainable Living Seven (Part One)


The mission of the Stanberry Green Team is to be an unparalleled resource for our clients looking to make greener real estate choices.  If being a better steward of the environment has value to you, you may enjoy this seven part series on expanding stewardship beyond real estate.  Here are the Stanberry Sustainable Living Seven, one post at a time.  Stay tuned!

Everyone loves to eat, so let’s start with FOOD!  There is so much benefit to the planet and to our health with attentive eating choices.

+Buy local and organic as much as you can, and support restaurants that use locally sourced produce and meats.  Grow some of your own!

There are health benefits and fuel saving benefits galore from adopting this practice, and it turns out to be fun (addictive, even) to support local growers, choose organics, and even grow some of our own.  Make changes gradually.  Start by buying produce once a month from a farmer’s market.  Take your grocery tote (Stanberry has them free for you if you need some!) and talk to the folks who raise/make the stuff.  If you don’t like that idea, try a delivery service like Greenling.  When you shop at a supermarket, add “how far away did this come from?” to the list of items you always compare, like price and health benefits.   Organic onions farmed in Texas may cost more than conventionally grown onions from California, but if you also consider the amount of fuel used to get them here, the “bigger picture” vote is for the Texas onions.  As we collectively begin to change the way we make purchase decisions, the market changes in response.  Our demand creates more supply, which helps prices come down.

We have become accustomed to having whatever we want, whenever we want it, and forget to factor the fuel cost of shipping items over long distances.  Produce shipped over long distances like this is invariably pulled green, fumigated, waxed, and otherwise made to tolerate unnatural handling.  The growing practices for huge production farms are not sustainable or earth friendly.  Growing and raising food that is intended for a local market results in healthier food, better stewardship of the land, and more dollars being used directly in our local communities.   Remember to include wine, spirits, cheeses, honey, eggs, oils, jellies, nuts, etc. in your “I Love Local” planning.

Regarding food and playing your part in defense of the environment, try to eat “lower on the food chain”.  Start small if you need to; one vegetarian meal a week may whet your appetite for more.  If meat is a must for you, buy from local small farm sources.  It takes a lot more fuel, water, and energy to produce meat than plants, and the production of meat animals by the huge factory farms that produce most of what is in our grocery stores is seriously harmful to the soil, air and water.  The UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization tells us the livestock sector produces more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks worldwide combined.  The health benefits of eating more grains, vegetables, and fruit are widely known, as well.  Take steps in this direction for the health of you, your family, and the environment.

Here are some good sites to help you get started, or further your knowledge if you have been at this practice for a while:

http://citizengardener.ning.com/           http://www.austinfarmtotable.com/  www.localharvest.org

www.edibleaustin.com        www.austinfarmersmarket.org     www.greenling.com    

And check the Live-Eat-Buy Local section on this Stanberry Green Living site…

Home Depot $$ for Green Building


A now nationally-expanded partnership will help funnel $30 million to help build environmentally-friendly homes.

The Partners in Sustainable Building will join the forces of the Home Depot Foundation and Habitat for Humanity International on a national level with the goal of building 5,000 homes that meet Energy Star standards over the next five years.earthmover

“By embracing the practical principles of green building, our partnership with Habitat for Humanity International is demonstrating that these techniques can actually make homes more affordable to own, maintain and live in from day one and for the long-term,” Kelly Caffarelli, president of the Home Depot Foundation, said. “With health and economic concerns at an all-time high, this issue is more important than ever for the families who will purchase these homes.”

More than 120 Habitat for Humanity affiliates across the nation have been picked for the initial round of grants from the Home Depot Foundation. An affiliate will receive $3,000 for each house built to Energy Star Standards, and could get up to $5,000 for a house built beyond those standards.

The program has its roots in a pilot program between the Home Depot Foundation and Habitat for Humanity International affiliates. During that pilot program, more than 260 homes were built using green standards.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, building green has a number of economic, social and environmental benefits. For example, it can lead to a healthier lifestyle for a home’s occupants and can lead to lower energy bills.

Over the course of a home’s mortgage, the energy savings attained through green building can help pay off the initial cost. Furthermore, the money donated by the Home Depot Foundation will help encourage such building.

Along with the money for building, grants will be given in order to help host training sessions for Habitat affiliate organizations. Because the money donated by the Home Depot Foundation is distributed annually, each year different habitat organizations will get a chance to apply for the grants.

The Daily Tell.com

Greener Buildings Boost Profit?


Green, more than a color, is a catchall term used to describe an ecoconscious lifestyle, including everything from hybrid-fuel-powered cars to recycled consumer goods to solar electricity. The big-minded concept is to preserve the Earth’s natural resources by reducing waste and pollution through innovative design and improved efficiency. In development circles, green has gone from a boutique idea to a mandatory part of architecture and construction.

“It’s not just about energy savings,” said Craig Willcut, president of United Construction, which opened new sustainable offices in Reno this year. “It’s about providing a healthy environment for employees, as well as being socially responsible for our part of the environment.”

Buildings are responsible for 40 percent of the Earth’s global warming, observers say.

 ”Corporate responsibility is becoming unavoidable,” said Rick Van Diepen, chairman of the Committee on the Environment for the Las Vegas chapter of the American Institute of Architects. “Employee productivity is being improved by 1 percent to 2 percent, conservatively, by working in a green building. That is a huge bottom-line savings.”

“Turning green can cut energy costs by 40 percent or more, and upgrading a building’s lighting can add $6 per square foot to its value.”

Read the entire article here:  Las Vegas Review-Journal: http://www.lvrj.com/business/52301302.html